Op 1 jul 2011, om 10:10 heeft Richard Purdie het volgende geschreven:
> On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 09:15 +0200, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Op 1 jul 2011, om 01:26 heeft Saul Wold het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> On 06/28/2011 02:05 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
>>>> Changes of V4:
>>>>
>>>> * Change the definition of GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER as Richard suggested.
>>>>
>>>> e.g., the entries in the files that look like:
>>>> #define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER64 "/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2"
>>>>
>>>> become
>>>>
>>>> #define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER64 SYSTEMLIBS_DIR"/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2"
>>>>
>>>> and we define SYSTEMLIBS_DIR in defaults.h.
>>>>
>>>> NOTE, the round brackets:
>>>> #define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER64 (SYSTEMLIBS_DIR "/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2")
>>>>
>>>> doesn't work in in the following define:
>>>>
>>>> #define LINUX_DYNAMIC_LINKER \
>>>> CHOOSE_DYNAMIC_LINKER (GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER,
>>>> UCLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER)
>>>>
>>>> so use:
>>>> #define GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER64 SYSTEMLIBS_DIR"/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2"
>>>>
>>>> * Compare to V3, reduce two patches which are for gcc-crosssdk.inc and
>>>> gcc-cross-canadian which are not needed any more.
>>>>
>>>> * Fix the conflicts(gcc-4.6.0 -> gcc-4.6, and the ${BRANCH})
>>>>
>>>> * Both tested 4.5.1 and 4.6:
>>>> $ bitbake meta-toolchain core-image-sato
>>>> $ runqemu qemurm
>>>>
>>>> Also unpack the sdk to /opt and test to make sure the toolchain works
>>>> well.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>> a1f79a7896b6411669b3ccada6204d2695e80fc5:
>>>>
>>>> runqueue.py: Add umask task control (2011-06-24 12:23:12 +0100)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>> git://git.pokylinux.org/poky-contrib robert/share_gcc
>>>> http://git.pokylinux.org/cgit.cgi/poky-contrib/log/?h=robert/share_gcc
>>>>
>>>> Robert Yang (4):
>>>> bitbake: share source directory
>>>> Share gcc work directories
>>>> gcc-4.5.1: share work directories
>>>> gcc-4.6: share work directories
>>>>
>>>> bitbake/lib/bb/build.py | 4 +-
>>>> bitbake/lib/bb/cache.py | 3 +
>>>> bitbake/lib/bb/runqueue.py | 10 +++
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.5.1.inc | 1 +
>>>> .../gcc-4.5.1/use-defaults.h-and-t-oe-in-B.patch | 57 ++++++++++++++
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6.inc | 5 +-
>>>> .../gcc/gcc-4.6/use-defaults.h-and-t-oe-in-B.patch | 80
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-common.inc | 32 +++++++-
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-common.inc | 48 +++++++-----
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-configure-cross.inc | 4 +-
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-crosssdk.inc | 6 --
>>>> 11 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>>>> create mode 100644
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.5.1/use-defaults.h-and-t-oe-in-B.patch
>>>> create mode 100644
>>>> meta/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-4.6/use-defaults.h-and-t-oe-in-B.patch
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Openembedded-core mailing list
>>>> Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
>>>> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
>>>>
>>>
>>> Merged into OE-Core
>>
>> incremental build with rm_work turned on:
>>
>> ERROR: Function 'do_configure' failed (see
>> /OE/tentacle/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r37.0+svnr175127/temp/log.do_configure.27092
>> for further information)
>> ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in:
>> /OE/tentacle/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r37.0+svnr175127/temp/log.do_configure.27092
>> Log data follows:
>> | + cd
>> /OE/tentacle/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r37.0+svnr175127/gcc-4.5/build.x86_64-linux.arm-angstrom-linux-gnueabi
>> | + do_configure
>> | + sed -i
>> '/OE/tentacle/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r37.0+svnr175127/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/config/*/linux*.h'
>> -e 's#\(GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER[^ ]*\)\( *"/lib.*\)#\1 SYSTEMLIBS_DIR\2#'
>> | sed: can't read
>> /OE/tentacle/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r37.0+svnr175127/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/config/*/linux*.h:
>> No such file or directory
>> | ERROR: Function 'do_configure' failed (see
>> /OE/tentacle/build/tmp-angstrom_2010_x-eglibc/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r37.0+svnr175127/temp/log.do_configure.27092
>> for further information)
>> NOTE: package gcc-cross-initial-4.5-r37.0+svnr175127: task do_configure:
>> Failed
>> ERROR: Task 764
>> (/OE/tentacle/sources/meta-openembedded/meta-oe/recipes-devtools/gcc/gcc-cross-initial_4.5.bb,
>> do_configure) failed with exit code '1'
>>
>> Can this patchset get reverted please and reapplied when it actually has
>> been tested to work?
>
> Testing patches is not the sole responsibility of myself and Saul. This
> gcc patchset was on the mailing list for a considerable time and has
> been tested in a variety of ways. Various breakage was identified found
> and those breakages were fixed. The fact there looks to be some
> incremental build issue with rm_work is unfortunate and likely easy to
> fix so I think this request is a little out of proportion.
>
> If someone had reported the problem before it merged it would have
> waited until it was fixed before merging.
"They will therefore merge and I'm happy with them but it will be a few
more days before that happens. "
I was under the impression that I still had a few more days to test them now
that the eglibc problems have been solved. I don't think you can blame people
for not testing gcc when eglibc was still blowing up in their faces.
> I find it ironic you're one of the people asking to turn the autobuilder
> red, make warnings fatal and break things for everyone as 'its the only
> way to get people to look at and fix them; but on the other hand you're
> unhappy if testing of patches doesn't happen on every single combination
> of usages and something does break :/.
I was actually planning to test them today, now that eglibc works again.
_______________________________________________
Openembedded-core mailing list
Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
