Great, thanks Andrew! I'll look into your code. Appreciate you taking the
time to write that.

Vào Th 3, 14 thg 5, 2019 vào lúc 12:56 Andrew Dalke <
da...@dalkescientific.com> đã viết:

> Hi Spencer,
>
>   Here's a solution which indirectly builds on the Open Babel
> functionality to find rings and identify components.
>
> A direct algorithm would do as Noel suggest: use something like a
> depth-first search to find all ring atoms and from that figure out the
> number of connected ring systems.
>
> This round-about solution uses the SMARTS matcher to find the ring atoms
> (building on Open Babel's ring finder), delete the ring atoms, generate a
> SMILES (builds on Open Babel's component detection code), and counts the
> number of components as <number of '.' characters> + 1.
>
> It's slow, and uses some heavy-weight mechanisms, but I think it gets the
> answer you are looking for. There may be more efficient ways to, for
> example, count the number of components.
>
> I haven't really tested it though.
>
> It also works because your definition says that rings connected by a sprio
> atom are part of the same ring system. If they were parts of different
> systems then the implementation would be more difficult.
>
>
>                                 Andrew
>                                 da...@dalkescientific.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

Reply via email to