Looks like a bug. Not sure how I missed this one. I'll look into it asap.

- Noel

On 29 November 2011 11:17, JP <jeanpaul.ebe...@inhibox.com> wrote:
> Using OpenBabel 2.3.1, on Ubuntu Linux 10.10
>
> Using the attached *seemingly unsuspect and correct* sdf file - zzz.sdf.
>
> Converting this file to smiles:
>
> $ obabel zzz.sdf -osmi -Ozzz.smi
> 2 molecules converted
>
> Gives us the expected and correct result:
> $ more zzz.smi
> C[C@@H](N)C(=O)O        Ala1
> C[C@H](N)C(=O)O Ala2
>
> Adding hydrogens to the original sdf file:
>
> $ obabel zzz.sdf -osdf -OzzzH.sdf -h
> 2 molecules converted
>
> Now converting the H-added sdf file to smiles:
>
> $ obabel zzzH.sdf -osmi -OzzzH.smi
> 2 molecules converted
>
> STEREO INVERTED:: (!!!)
>
> $ more zzzH.smi
> C[C@H](N)C(=O)O Ala1
> C[C@@H](N)C(=O)O        Ala2
>
> Any ideas why this happens?  This is somewhat unexpected behaviour.
>
>
> -
> Jean-Paul Ebejer
> Early Stage Researcher
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
> OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure 
contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, 
security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this 
data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

Reply via email to