On Jun 8, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Noel O'Boyle wrote:
> I'm well aware of the Zen of Python - it governed my design decisions.
> If you think that this means Pybel should not exist, I would disagree,
> and I think many users would too.
Not at all. I've been talking about how the Pybel/Cinfony interface is by far
the easiest API to use among all of the toolkits. The above was contextual
lead-up to my next question.
(Besides, that Zen point doesn't mean there can't be two ways.)
>> Is pybel the preferred way to do things on the Python level?
>
> That requires a poll of users. Personally, IMHO, I don't know why you
> would use the bindings directly where you could use Pybel. But usually
> I end up using a combination.
Users, speak up! :)
Andrew
da...@dalkescientific.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
