On 8 June 2010 15:43, Andrew Dalke <da...@dalkescientific.com> wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2010, at 2:43 AM, Noel O'Boyle wrote:
>>>  OB also supports using a molecule as the query rather than a SMARTS.
>>
>> Hmm...not sure about this. Does it?
>
> I thought it did, but you and others disagree. I'll look again.
>
>> MACCS key is in there. There is also support for user-defined fingerprints.
>
> Huh. That was added last year with 2.2.1 and I missed it. Thanks!
>
> On the topic of documentation quality (which Geoff asked about), how does one 
> find this out?
>
> Go to http://openbabel.org/wiki/Develop and there's mention of FP2, FP3 and 
> FP4 but not MACCS fingerprints.
>
> Go to http://openbabel.org/wiki/Developer:API and search 2.2.0 documentation 
> for MACCS and it isn't there. There's no link to the 2.2.1 documentation and 
> for some reason there's a link to the 2.1.x beta API docs, which would be 
> very out of date now, and pointless, yes?

We do appreciate feedback on this, as we receive very little. I
usually google "openbabel fingerprints" which points you to
http://openbabel.org/wiki/Tutorial:Fingerprints. I'll fix the other
pages.

> (BTW, what's the reason that OB prefers these point releases, like
>  - 2009-07-31 Open Babel 2.2.3 Released
>  - 2009-07-10 Open Babel 2.2.2 Released
>  - 2009-02-03 Open Babel 2.2.1 Released
>  - 2008-07-04 Open Babel 2.2.0 Released
> ? There's been some major changes during those releases, so would seem to 
> warrant 2.3, 2.4, and higher.)

The numbering is based on API changes, not features (or marketing!).
The next version is 2.3.0 for example.

>>>  OB does not do depiction. For that case people should turn to other 
>>> libraries, such as OASA.
>>
>> OB can do depiction, at least in the development version.
>
> One of the difficulties I have in making my report is that all of the 
> libraries have things in development, available for the next release. Is 
> there a roadmap/timeline for that? The one at 
> http://openbabel.org/wiki/Roadmap seems out of date since the last edit was 
> Dec 2006.

There isn't.

> At the last Python conference, Mark Shuttleworth's keynote address was on 
> "Cadence, Quality, and Design"
>  http://us.pycon.org/2010/conference/schedule/event/122/
> and one lesson I learned was the usefulness of having predictable schedules. 
> It's still something I'm thinking about, and I thought might be interesting 
> in this context.

I don't think this is feasible, unless we have more developers who
will fix bugs.

> Again regarding documentation, how does one learn how to do this?
>
> http://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&q=depiction+site:openbabel.org&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8
>
> finds all of two pages, both for pybel saying it uses OASA. Will pybel in 
> 2.2.4 (or 2.3?) use the internal depicter instead of OASA? I see it will 
> support SVG, but will it also support a bitmap format of some sort?

Our documentation focuses on the released version.

I'm not sure right now what Pybel will do; I think I may support both
OASA and the internal depictor but it depends on the time constraints.

>> Also MacOSX and Ruby. Also Cygwin, ...
>
> Indeed, but my client doesn't use those. ;)
>
>> Don't forget Pybel is part of OpenBabel.
>
> *smacks* *head*
>
> D'oh! I was thinking about the C++ interface here, comparing it to Python. 
> Brain reset.
>
>> One other feature you haven't mentioned is that it has a plugin
>> architecture for fingerprints, formats, operations, charge models and
>> so forth (it's the same architecture in each case).
>
> Despite my subject line, this thread is more "OB features my client is 
> interested in, based on talking with them."
>
> While I know that it's possible, I can't find the documentation about it. How 
> does one develop a new fingerprint? During testing can the new .so be in the 
> user's directory space, or must extensions be in the OpenBabel installation?

I'm not sure.

>
>                                Andrew
>                                da...@dalkescientific.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate
> GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the
> lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win:
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
> _______________________________________________
> OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
> OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate 
GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the 
lucky parental unit.  See the prize list and enter to win: 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo
_______________________________________________
OpenBabel-discuss mailing list
OpenBabel-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openbabel-discuss

Reply via email to