El diumenge, 20 de maig de 2018, a les 11:52:04 CEST, Dileep Sankhla va escriure: > Hi Albert, > > > On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote: > > El divendres, 18 de maig de 2018, a les 17:04:09 CEST, Dileep Sankhla va > > > > escriure: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > I'm working on my GSoC project[0] with my mentor Tobias Deiminger > > > <haxtibal[at]posteo[dot]de> and I need to add a new 'typewriter' tool to > > > the annotation toolbar with a new icon and a setting dialogue to > > > > customize > > > > > its font [and font color]. > > > > > > I have few things to ask before getting it done and it would be nice if > > > > you > > > > > can reply to any of the queries with your own suggestions. > > > > > > 3. Inline note has a "hover icon" (see tools.xml) which is shown when a > > > dashed line block is drawn while dragging the mouse to create a note. Do > > > > we > > > > > also need a different hover icon for typewriter or should we get rid of > > > > it? > > > > > In my opinion, we should get rid of it instead of creating a new hover > > > > icon > > > > > for typewriter. What do you say? > > > > Why do you think we should remove a feature we have? What is in your > > opinion > > the reason to get rid of it? > > As discussed earlier in a private mail where Tobias CCed you, we are first > making the text input UI same as that of Inline note. Here you can argue > that we need the typewriter-hover-icon but when we are going to implement > the WYSIWYG live editing feature just after, do we still need it? I mean > yes we will drag the mouse to create a dashed line rectangular box for > creating annotation on page and it should show the typewriter-hover-icon > then, but I don't know what kind of hover icon should we design for the > typewriter? And what if the community selects another approach (see the > earlier mail in okular-devel with the subject, "FreeText typewriter > annotation WYSIWYG implementation ideas") where we can use KTextEdit widget > of fixed dimensions to directly draw a WYSIWYG editor on the page? Hence > out of this ambiguity, in my opinion, we should get rid of it. Waiting for > your suggestion.
Are you speaking of not having that for the new tool or removing it altogether? Cheers, Albert > > > Cheers, > > > > Albert > > Thanks and Regards, > Dileep
