aacid added a comment.

  In https://phabricator.kde.org/D7671#142933, @progwolff wrote:
  
  > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D7671#142826, @aacid wrote:
  >
  > > I don't know who told you this is the correct behaviour of kdirwatch, but 
i kind of disagree.
  > >
  > > Since we're not watching the file but *also* the folder.
  >
  >
  > From the KDirWatch class reference:
  >
  > > void KDirWatch::dirty     (       const QString &         path    )       
signal
  > >  Emitted when a watched object is changed.
  > > 
  > > For a directory this signal is emitted when files therein are created or 
deleted. [...]
  > > 
  > > When you watch a directory, changes in the size or attributes of 
contained files may or may not trigger this signal to be emitted depending on 
which backend is used by KDirWatch.
  >
  > So, let's assume we have a file `path/file` loaded in Okular and we watch 
the directory `path` for changes. We remove `file` and create a new file named 
`file`. The directory `path` will get dirty, as a new file is created.
  >  This means, a signal `dirty("path")` is emitted. However, Okular does not 
reload the document when the signal `dirty("path")` is received, but waits for 
a signal `dirty("path/file")`.
  
  
  No, the code doesn't wait *only* for a dirty for path/file, read 
Part::slotFileDirty better
  
  The problem here is that dirty for the path is not being emitted, 
https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2017-August/048813.html if 
the dirty for the dir was getting emitted on delete and on addition i'm 
positive this would work.
  
  > The behaviour of KDirWatch might not be the most convenient, but from my 
perspective it is consistent with the documentation.
  >  Maybe the docs could be a little clearer at this point, like Henrik and 
Oliver proposed.
  > 
  >  ____________
  > 
  > In https://phabricator.kde.org/D7671#142844, @rkflx wrote:
  > 
  >> (Julian: Sorry to intrude, feel free to pick up from here.)
  > 
  > 
  > Always happy when someone contributes good ideas to a discussion.

REPOSITORY
  R223 Okular

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D7671

To: progwolff, aacid
Cc: sander, rkflx, #okular, aacid

Reply via email to