> On Okt. 17, 2015, 7:53 nachm., Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > The internet disagrees with you and says that cannot and can not are both > > acceptable spellings.
That's from http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/words/cannot-or-can-not, right? :-) If you keep reading there you'll see that 'can not' is really only used under particular circumstances, which don't apply here. But this issue is really not important enough to start a discussion. I'll discard it. - Oliver ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125677/#review86983 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Okt. 17, 2015, 6 nachm., Oliver Sander wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125677/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Okt. 17, 2015, 6 nachm.) > > > Review request for Okular. > > > Repository: okular > > > Description > ------- > > Fix spelling of 'cannot' -- it is a single word. > > > Diffs > ----- > > core/document.cpp 22bd9cc > core/utils.h 712e1c0 > part.cpp bce40cd > > Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125677/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Oliver Sander > >
_______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
