> On April 9, 2015, 1:58 a.m., Jan Kundrát wrote:
> > -1 from me. The unconditional dep got introduced in 
> > 93918b1ec8f585dd135db1449e1b22b878f82fbc, which looks like a mistake to me. 
> > Why not:
> > -
> > -    find_package(KF5 CONFIG COMPONENTS Activities)
> 
> Ivan Čukić wrote:
>     While I don't mind making it again an optional dep, I want to mention 
> that the Gwenview, Kate and KWrite made it a hard requirement. Is there a 
> reason why Okular needs it to be optional?
> 
> Jan Kundrát wrote:
>     IMHO reducing dependencies is a good thing in general. I for one do not 
> have a use for KActivities.
> 
> Ivan Čukić wrote:
>     If this is disabled during the build, the following will happen:
>     
>     - Kicker will not show documents opened with okular in the recent 
> documents section
>     - Share plasmoid will not support sharing the currently opened document 
> in okular
>     - Tasks applet will not show recent documents for okular
>     
>     ![Recent documents in Kicker](http://i.imgur.com/TVxCuL1.png)
>     ![Recent documents in Tasks](http://i.imgur.com/e4N38fQ.png)
>     ![Sharing a document](http://i.imgur.com/TVxCuL1.png)
> 
> Ivan Čukić wrote:
>     Duplicate image above
>     
>     ![Recent kickoff](http://i.imgur.com/r4VYCs2.png)
> 
> Jan Kundrát wrote:
>     Anyway, if the Okular maintainers want to have this unconditional, that's 
> their decision; I have plenty of RAM for those libs that I don't use :). What 
> I was pointing out is just that the commit message (or actually the "text in 
> this review") is not an accurate description of how these things actually 
> happened. Maybe this would be a better description:
>     
>         Make KActivities a required dependency
>         
>         Our goal is better integration with the rest of the desktop (FIXME: 
> just KDE or anybody else?).
>         
>         We have made a conscious decision to reduce our code a bit by 
> removing the legacy #ifdefs. That way we do not have to support a build 
> configuration which is going to be used by just a tiny minority of our users, 
> and one that we are not terribly interested in. Without KActivities, there is 
> for example no support for recording  and listing of recent documents, PDF 
> sharing etc etc, and we honestly believe that the majority of our audience 
> wants these features.

As I said, I'm fine either way. Just wanted to post what will happen when this 
is disabled.

The description you wrote is cool I have to say :)


- Ivan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123249/#review78690
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 3, 2015, 8:39 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123249/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 3, 2015, 8:39 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular and Albert Astals Cid.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Since the a3fb02b881d commit, the KF5::Activities are a required dependency 
> (CMakeLists.txt:31).
> 
> Still, the actual code uses ifdefs for KActivities_FOUND macro which no 
> longer exists. This patch removes the macros and restores the feature.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   autotests/CMakeLists.txt 0a0f546 
>   shell/CMakeLists.txt ec36582 
>   shell/shell.h f345cf3 
>   shell/shell.cpp 6bb89c5 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123249/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ivan Čukić
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Reply via email to