-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123176/#review78190
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


None of the people that did any frameworks branch work seem to be monitoring 
reviewboard, so i guess i'd say ship it if you know what you're doing :D

- Albert Astals Cid


On mar. 29, 2015, 1:40 p.m., Andreas Cord-Landwehr wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123176/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated mar. 29, 2015, 1:40 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This fixes two issues:
> 1. ${_okularBaseDir} provides a path to <somedir>/lib which prevents the 
> include dir to be found
> 2. the find_library search does not consider the architecture prefixes (here 
> I am unsure if I fixed it correctly or if NO_DEFAULT_PATH had a deeper 
> meaning)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   OkularConfig.cmake 59537c6 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/123176/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual testing.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Cord-Landwehr
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Reply via email to