https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=281813
Niels Ole Salscheider <niels_...@salscheider-online.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |niels_ole@salscheider-onlin
| |e.de
--- Comment #8 from Niels Ole Salscheider <niels_ole salscheider-online de>
2011-09-14 09:16:19 ---
> PDF supports Appearance Streams for annotations, so we could have latex render
> the formula into a PDF file and create the AP entry in the annotation dict
> from
> the pdf. We could also include some special entry in the annotation dict to
> indicate that this is in fact a rendered LaTeX formula and what the LaTeX code
> was so that we could edit it afterwards...
Is it a good idea to include a rendered formula? This way, we cannot adjust
font size and color easily...
> Same way we could --- I suppose at least --- add a custom field to the
> annotation xml entry to indicate that it is a formula so that we don't need
> to do automatic guessing (maybe even create a new annotation type).
If this is possible and can be stored in the PDF, too, it is probably the best
solution. But if we decide to go this way I think I need some help to implement
it.
Otherwise I can create a patch for the solution as proposed in comment #6.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
