On 10/13/10 12:28 AM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > A Divendres, 8 d'octubre de 2010, Miguel Vazquez va escriure: >> Well, that would mean saving the .okular file into a particular >> directory on my filesystem and then open that version next time. >> However, I maintain the pdf repository online and I'd like to be able to >> open the pdf by clicking the links on the online version, which would >> download a pdf new file into /tmp/ and would not be recognized by okular >> as having annotations. >> >> My fix is to save each pdf into a particular directory first time I >> open it, and annotations will get associated with the path of that >> version. Next time I open it I will detect I have the same file in the >> repository, by md5, and open that version instead (roughly). The problem >> is that I need to save an extra version of the file in that directory. I >> guess I could work around actually saving each file with a little work, >> but it will all be simpler if okular would make the md5 check itself. > Well, in the past we got complains when we did not use the path for > annotations since people said it was a different file, and now that's why we > use the path as identifier, adding the feature you request would annoy also > these group of people, i guess one can't make everybody happy. > > Albert >
Fair enough. Cheers Miguel >> Anyway, its just a suggestion, it may very well not make sense to >> include that functionality. >> >> Thank you very much for developing this tool, I found it extremely useful. >> >> Cheers. >> >> Miguel >> >> On 10/07/2010 08:23 PM, Albert Astals Cid wrote: >>> A Dijous, 7 d'octubre de 2010, Miguel Vazquez va escriure: >>>> Hi, >>> Hi! >>> >>>> I built a system to centralize my annotations for a document collection >>>> I have of scientific articles. I like to download them from a central >>>> document repository online and have them use any annotations I had from >>>> a previous read. I used the attached script that uses md5 checksums to >>>> see if the articles is already in my repo and uses that instead of the >>>> downloaded one (the script might not work straight out of the box >>>> though). >>>> >>>> Any way, maintaining my own pdf repo is a bit of a waste, I was >>>> wondering what you think of associating annotations with md5 checksums >>>> or something like that instead of file paths. For bookmarks >>>> unfortunately this does not work, because you need the path to open the >>>> file. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts? >>> Doesn't saving as document archive (.okular) fix this problem? >>> >>> Albert >>> >>>> Miguel >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Okular-devel mailing list >>> Okular-devel@kde.org >>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel >> _______________________________________________ >> Okular-devel mailing list >> Okular-devel@kde.org >> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel > _______________________________________________ > Okular-devel mailing list > Okular-devel@kde.org > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel
