i think what she(or he) said is a no-brainer.. things that went up, will go down and vice versa she(or he) said being no#2 after China seems ABNORMAL. so i think EL is a conservative type of trader (or investor) whether you accept teh news or not, that depends on your personal type again, which is also as no-brainer.. so trade safe, as always..
salam mrA --- In obrolan-bandar@yahoogroups.com, "james rajasa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Old trick, > > Elaine comes with bad news, IHSG may go down but it will not be anything > like nuke, new years firecrackers at best. > > ELAINE = Diversion, > > Watch major rebound from sleeping stocks like Antm > > Just a thought. > JRA > > > On 12/31/07, Elaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't have to prove anything, right? And don't challenge me. > > > > Any smart investor here would know that IHSG performance lately is very > > ABNORMAL. Out of sync. The biggest cap in BEI is downed *-20%* from its > > highest. Once called "the safest" stock, this "DEFENSIVE" one I'm talking > > about here is not playing defense anymore. > > > > Once the defense is breached, things will get ugly. Other defensive stocks > > WILL follow. > > > > Thanks to new IPOs and BUMI/ANTM "race", the IHSG is saved until the > > closing bell of 2007. It has NEVER been like this before, so you might not > > be prepared. If there weren't any race, IHSG would be 2400,.. or worse. > > > > Now, I want answers from you. WHICH stock/sector *would defend *the IHSG? > > Can we count on mining (again?), cpo? utility? property? banks? My answer is > > NO. Not yet. > > > > Btw, I create statements. YOU are the one who were overreacting. :) If you > > believe in your stocks, *hold'em tight*, or you may want to stay away. > > Whether you want to hold or sell, it's not my business. > > > > I am not evil. I don't like bears either, but I'd be the first to warn. > > You'll be glad if I am around, than hearing sweet "lies"... > > > > *EL > > > > **Thanks Embah for allowing me to be here again.** > > > > *
