Dear all, good news for Kristina & Torsten: After meeting and common solution with chairs I agree to move the draft forward.
Best steffen Von: Steffen Schwalm Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. April 2025 19:32 An: Kristina Yasuda <yasudakrist...@gmail.com>; ANTHONY NADALIN <nada...@prodigy.net> Cc: torsten=40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org; oauth <oauth@ietf.org> Betreff: AW: [OAUTH-WG] Re: Second WGLC for Token Status List I strongly oppose against moving forward the specification as Issues still open. 1. There´s no documented decision on the well-known x509 issue – beside the wishes of the authors 2. Still wait for information from chairs where and how to solve issue when not in TokenStatusList 3. Means TokenStatusList contains privacy issue in case used for Attestatiosn of attributes in eIDAS Von: Kristina Yasuda <yasudakrist...@gmail.com<mailto:yasudakrist...@gmail.com>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. April 2025 00:22 An: ANTHONY NADALIN <nada...@prodigy.net<mailto:nada...@prodigy.net>> Cc: torsten=40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:torsten=40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org>; oauth <oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>> Betreff: [OAUTH-WG] Re: Second WGLC for Token Status List Caution: This email originated from outside of the organization. Despite an upstream security check of attachments and links by Microsoft Defender for Office, a residual risk always remains. Only open attachments and links from known and trusted senders. I support moving this specification forward. It is a crucial building block for lifecycle management of different tokens/credentials. On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 9:42 PM ANTHONY NADALIN <nada...@prodigy.net<mailto:nada...@prodigy.net>> wrote: support this moving forward as we need this in ISO Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> ________________________________ From: torsten=40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org> <torsten=40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40lodderstedt....@dmarc.ietf.org>> Sent: Tuesday, April 1, 2025 11:38:22 AM To: oauth <oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>>; Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com<mailto:rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Re: Second WGLC for Token Status List Hi, I support moving this spec forward. best regards, Torsten. Am 24. März 2025, 13:41 +0100 schrieb Rifaat Shekh-Yusef <rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com<mailto:rifaat.s.i...@gmail.com>>: All, This is a second WG Last Call for the Token Status List document: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-status-list/ Please, review this document and reply on the mailing list if you have any comments or concerns, by April 7th. Regards, Rifaat & Hannes _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org> To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org<mailto:oauth-le...@ietf.org> _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org> To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org<mailto:oauth-le...@ietf.org>
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
