On Tue, Dec 24, 2024, 8:18 AM Brian Campbell <bcampb...@pingidentity.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 2:03 PM Watson Ladd <watsonbl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 6:17 AM Joseph Heenan <jos...@authlete.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I don’t think it is helpful to repeatedly make very similar proposals >>> whilst ignoring the feedback on why that proposal is inappropriate, nor >>> does it look like trying to meet halfway - this current proposal and >>> discussion is very similar to, for example, >>> https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/448/files >>> >> >> The objection Brian made to the PR was that it deleted text, not that the >> recommendation was too strong. >> > > And also that it was too strong. This > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/fDYIWVE50nhW6F8IO_jeUafKABo/ > was an attempt to somewhat politely say that the PR was completely > insufficient, even as a starting point. > What exactly am I supposed to do with that to try to arrive at text we can all live with? > > > > *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and > privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any > review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. > If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender > immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from > your computer. Thank you.*
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org
