On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 2:03 PM Watson Ladd <watsonbl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 6:17 AM Joseph Heenan <jos...@authlete.com> wrote:
>
>> I don’t think it is helpful to repeatedly make very similar proposals
>> whilst ignoring the feedback on why that proposal is inappropriate, nor
>> does it look like trying to meet halfway - this current proposal and
>> discussion is very similar to, for example,
>> https://github.com/oauth-wg/oauth-selective-disclosure-jwt/pull/448/files
>>
>
> The objection Brian made to the PR was that it deleted text, not that the
> recommendation was too strong.
>

And also that it was too strong. This
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/fDYIWVE50nhW6F8IO_jeUafKABo/
was an attempt to somewhat politely say that the PR was completely
insufficient, even as a starting point.

-- 
_CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email may contain confidential and privileged 
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review, use, 
distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited.  If you have 
received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail and delete the message and any file attachments from your 
computer. Thank you._
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list -- oauth@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to oauth-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to