Than you Nat for the quick reply and the fixes Regards
-éric From: Nat Sakimura <sakim...@gmail.com> Date: Thursday, 13 August 2020 at 15:43 To: Eric Vyncke <evyn...@cisco.com> Cc: The IESG <i...@ietf.org>, oauth <oauth@ietf.org>, "oauth-cha...@ietf.org" <oauth-cha...@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-oauth-jws...@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-oauth-jws...@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-26: (with COMMENT) Thanks, Éric. Reply inline: On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 5:47 PM Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <nore...@ietf.org<mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote: Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-26: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. Please find below a couple of non-blocking COMMENTs. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == Should the document shepherd's write-up be updated ? It is dated October 2016... about 4 years ago. -- Section 5.2 -- Based on the long history of this document, is the following statement "Many phones in the market as of this writing still" still valid ? Yes, partly because the demand for the authorization request payload is becoming large these days. As we can see in the PAR draft, we are precipitating to request_uri pattern. -- Section 5.2.1 -- Suggest to give a hint about the use of tfp.example.org<http://tfp.example.org> (TFP is expanded only in section 10.2). You are right. Perhaps it may be better to give two examples, one with TFP with one-liner explanation and another with URN that is being stored at the authorization server. == NITS == Please check the ID-NITS at https://tools.ietf.org/idnits?url=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-26.txt Thanks. Will do. _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) Chairman, OpenID Foundation http://nat.sakimura.org/ @_nat_en
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
