+1 for the diagrams making the document more understandable.

One little nit/question, step 1 in both Symmetric and Asymmetric keys shows
the Presenter sending the key to the Issuer. It's possible, however, for
the key to be sent the other way. Presenter sending it to the Issuer is
probably preferred for asymmetric, especially if the client can secure the
private keys in hardware. But I don't know if one way or the other is
clearly better for symmetric case and PoP key distribution currently has it
the other way
<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-02#section-4.2>.
Should the intro text somehow mention the possibility that the Issuer could
create the key and send it to the Presenter?

I know it's only the introduction but it was just something that jumped out
at me.

<https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-pop-key-distribution-02#section-4.2>

On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for suggesting the diagrams, Kepeng. They make the document more
> understandable.
>
> -- Mike
> ------------------------------
> From: Kepeng Li <kepeng....@alibaba-inc.com>
> Sent: ‎11/‎5/‎2015 12:57 AM
> To: Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>; oauth@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs spec addressing
> final shepherd comment
>
> Thank you Mike.
>
> The diagrams look good to me.
>
> Kind Regards
> Kepeng
>
> 发件人: Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com>
> 日期: Thursday, 5 November, 2015 12:32 am
> 至: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
> 抄送: Li Kepeng <kepeng....@alibaba-inc.com>
> 主题: Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs spec addressing final
> shepherd comment
>
> Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs draft -06 addresses the
> remaining document shepherd comment – adding use case diagrams to the
> introduction.
>
>
>
> The updated specification is available at:
>
> ·
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-06
>
>
>
> An HTML formatted version is also available at:
>
> ·
> https://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-06.html
>
>
>
>                                                             -- Mike
>
>
>
> P.S.  This note was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1471 and as
> @selfissued <https://twitter.com/selfissued>.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to