Thanks for suggesting the diagrams, Kepeng. They make the document more 
understandable.

-- Mike
________________________________
From: Kepeng Li<mailto:kepeng....@alibaba-inc.com>
Sent: ‎11/‎5/‎2015 12:57 AM
To: Mike Jones<mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com>; 
oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs spec addressing final 
shepherd comment

Thank you Mike.

The diagrams look good to me.

Kind Regards
Kepeng

???: Mike Jones 
<michael.jo...@microsoft.com<mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com>>
??: Thursday, 5 November, 2015 12:32 am
?: "oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>" 
<oauth@ietf.org<mailto:oauth@ietf.org>>
??: Li Kepeng <kepeng....@alibaba-inc.com<mailto:kepeng....@alibaba-inc.com>>
??: Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs spec addressing final shepherd 
comment

Proof-of-Possession Key Semantics for JWTs draft -06 addresses the remaining 
document shepherd comment – adding use case diagrams to the introduction.

The updated specification is available at:

·        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-06

An HTML formatted version is also available at:

·        
https://self-issued.info/docs/draft-ietf-oauth-proof-of-possession-06.html

                                                            -- Mike

P.S.  This note was also posted at http://self-issued.info/?p=1471 and as 
@selfissued<https://twitter.com/selfissued>.
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to