That’s true, but RFC6749 uses the term Authorization request to mean the request sent to the authorization endpoint.
See 4.1.1, 4.2.1, 4.3.1, 4.4.1 of RFC6749. Best, -- Nat Sakimura < <mailto:n-sakim...@nri.co.jp> n-sakim...@nri.co.jp> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. PLEASE READ: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system. From: Jim Manico [mailto:j...@manicode.com] Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2015 12:28 AM To: Nat Sakimura <n-sakim...@nri.co.jp> Cc: oauth <oauth@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request But its all authorization, even the token request.... -- Jim Manico @Manicode Secure Coding Education +1 (808) 652-3805 On Oct 9, 2015, at 5:23 PM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakim...@nri.co.jp <mailto:n-sakim...@nri.co.jp> > wrote: The reason for saying authorization request is that there are two types of requests in RFC6749; authorization request and token request. This draft deals with the former and thus named JAR. Nat 2015年10月9日金曜日、Jim Manico<j...@manicode.com <mailto:j...@manicode.com> >さんは書きました: The word authorization is implied by OAuth, consider "OAuth 2.0 JWT Request". -- Jim Manico @Manicode (808) 652-3805 On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:43 AM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakim...@nri.co.jp <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','n-sakim...@nri.co.jp');> > wrote: Hi OAuthers: One of the to do for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-05 is to come up with a better title. The current title “OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request (JAR)”, is somewhat better than what it used to be, but if you can suggest a better name, I am all for it. Please let me know if you have an idea. Best, -- Nat Sakimura < <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','n-sakim...@nri.co.jp');> n-sakim...@nri.co.jp> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. PLEASE READ: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system. _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','OAuth@ietf.org');> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth -- Nat Sakimura (=nat) http://www.sakimura.org/en/ http://twitter.com/_nat_en
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
