https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6749#section-4.1.1 Authorization Request is explicit too.
Naming could be about the why or the what. JAR is in the what-is-is category. “Signed and Encrypted Authorization Request” would be more in the why category. I think JAR is not bad. -A From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jim Manico Sent: Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015 03:47 To: Nat Sakimura Cc: oauth Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Better title for OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request The word authorization is implied by OAuth, consider "OAuth 2.0 JWT Request". -- Jim Manico @Manicode (808) 652-3805 On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:43 AM, Nat Sakimura <n-sakim...@nri.co.jp<mailto:n-sakim...@nri.co.jp>> wrote: Hi OAuthers: One of the to do for https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-jwsreq-05 is to come up with a better title. The current title “OAuth 2.0 JWT Authorization Request (JAR)”, is somewhat better than what it used to be, but if you can suggest a better name, I am all for it. Please let me know if you have an idea. Best, -- Nat Sakimura <n-sakim...@nri.co.jp<mailto:n-sakim...@nri.co.jp>> Nomura Research Institute, Ltd. PLEASE READ: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete your copy from your system. _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
