Interesting. The definitions in that don't correspond with what ADs and other 
groups are doing. 

I heard httpbis using experimental as a placeholder for a draft that didn't 
have full consensus to bring back later. 

That was the feel I had in Toronto-that we weren't done but it was time to 
publish something. 

Reading the actual definition i would say neither fits. Ugh. 

Phil

> On Sep 11, 2014, at 8:01, "Richer, Justin P." <jric...@mitre.org> wrote:
> 
> According to the guidelines here:
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/informational-vs-experimental.html
> 
> And the discussion in Toronto, it's clearly experimental.
> 
> -- Justin
> 
>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 10:36 AM, Anthony Nadalin <tony...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Is "experimental" the correct classification? Maybe "informational" is more 
>> appropriate as both of these were discussed. 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hannes Tschofenig
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 4:50 PM
>> To: oauth@ietf.org
>> Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol: Next 
>> Steps?
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> in response to the discussions at the last IETF meeting the authors of the 
>> "Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol"
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management-05 have 
>> changed the document type to "Experimental".
>> 
>> We need to make a decision about the next steps for the document and we see 
>> the following options:
>> 
>> a) Publish it as an experimental RFC
>> 
>> b) Remove it from the working group and ask an AD to shepherd it
>> 
>> c) Remove it from the working group and let the authors publish it via the 
>> independent submission track.
>> 
>> In any case it would be nice to let folks play around with it and then, 
>> after some time, come back to determine whether there is enough interest to 
>> produce a standard.
>> 
>> Please let us know what you think!
>> 
>> Ciao
>> Hannes & Derek
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to