+1 Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 10, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Mike Jones <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> wrote: > > +1 > > This gets it off the working group’s plate and lets us gather data about > whether this useful or not and whether it’s right or whether changes are > needed, based on actual usage experience. > > From: OAuth [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Justin Richer > Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 5:05 PM > To: Hannes Tschofenig; oauth@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol: Next > Steps? > > a) Publish it as experimental. There was reasonable support for this in both > Toronto and London. > > -- Justin > > On 9/10/2014 7:50 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote: > Hi all, > > in response to the discussions at the last IETF meeting the authors of > the "Dynamic Client Registration Management Protocol" > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-dyn-reg-management-05 have > changed the document type to "Experimental". > > We need to make a decision about the next steps for the document and we > see the following options: > > a) Publish it as an experimental RFC > > b) Remove it from the working group and ask an AD to shepherd it > > c) Remove it from the working group and let the authors publish it via > the independent submission track. > > In any case it would be nice to let folks play around with it and then, > after some time, come back to determine whether there is enough interest > to produce a standard. > > Please let us know what you think! > > Ciao > Hannes & Derek > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
