Hi all,

as you have seen from the meeting minutes of our recent status chat it
is time to proceed with the dynamic client registration work.

The earlier version of the dynamic client registration document was
split into three parts, namely
  (1) the current working group draft containing only minimal
functionality,
  (2) a document describing meta-data, and
  (3) a document containing management functionality.

This change was made as outcome of the discussions we had more or less
over the last 9 months.

The latter two documents are individual submissions at this point. New
content is not available with the recent changes. So, it is one of those
document management issues.

I had a chat with Stephen about WG adoption of the two individual
submissions as WG items. It was OK for him given that it is a purely
document management action. However, before we turn the documents into
WG items we need your feedback on a number of issues:

1) Do you have concerns with the document split? Do you object or
approve it?
2) Is the separation of the functionality into these three documents
correct? Should the line be drawn differently?
3) Do you have comments on the documents overall?

We would like to receive high-level feedback within a week. We are also
eager to hear from implementers and other projects using the dynamic
client registration work (such as OpenID Connect, UMA, the
BlueButton/GreenButton Initiative, etc.)

For more detailed reviews please wait till we re-do the WGLC (which we
plan to do soon). We have to restart the WGLC due to discussions last
years and the resulting changes to these documents.

Ciao
Hannes & Derek

PS: Derek and I also think that Phil should become co-auhor of these
documents for his contributions.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to