Thanks Justin, I reported this errata at RFC errata report page. On 2013/01/08, at 0:00, Justin Richer <jric...@mitre.org> wrote:
> I believe you're correct, Nov, and that this was potentially a mistake from > the RFC editor. That sentence *should* be talking about the resource owner's > password. > > -- Justin > > On 01/07/2013 06:53 AM, nov matake wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I couldn't understand why "their" became "the third party's" in the diff >> between draft31 and RFC6749 below. >> >> === >> Resource owners cannot revoke access to an individual third-party third party >> without revoking access to all third-parties, third parties, and must do so >> by >> changing their the third party's password. >> >> (from http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=rfc6749) >> === >> >> I read "their" as "resource owners'". >> Is this typo, or am I missing some point? >> >> Thanks >> >> nov >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OAuth mailing list >> OAuth@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
