I believe you're correct, Nov, and that this was potentially a mistake
from the RFC editor. That sentence *should* be talking about the
resource owner's password.
-- Justin
On 01/07/2013 06:53 AM, nov matake wrote:
Hi all,
I couldn't understand why "their" became "the third party's" in the
diff between draft31 and RFC6749 below.
===
Resource owners cannot revoke access to an individual third-party
*third party*
without revoking access to all third-parties, *third parties,* and
must do so by
changing their *the third party's* password.
(from http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=rfc6749)
===
I read "their" as "resource owners'".
Is this typo, or am I missing some point?
Thanks
nov
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
