On 2012-07-17 19:54, Mike Jones wrote:
The change and the reason for it were called out to the working group in http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg09594.html.
Indeed, as fait accompli. There were four days between the telco and the publication of the new draft for actually reporting the planned changes to the WG.
What additional text would you propose that the RFC editor add to explain the deviance from RFC 2617?
I would propose to undo the change. Best regards, Julian _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
