I'm just looking at the parts copied to the list and in the tracker. I haven't actually seen much response coming from Russ. I did reach out to him directly to see if the discuss can be resolve without further action.
EH > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Saint-Andre [mailto:stpe...@stpeter.im] > Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 6:38 PM > To: Eran Hammer > Cc: oauth@ietf.org WG (oauth@ietf.org) > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Bearer token DISCUSS items related to errors > > On 5/9/12 6:17 PM, Eran Hammer wrote: > > > All Russ was asking for is an explanation. Instead, he was told there > > was no good reason and that it should be changed. That was clearly not > > an honest representation of clear working group consensus from over 10 > > months ago which was achieved at great effort. > > Was it presented this way in the proto write-up or verbally on an IESG > telechat or in some other way? Just curious to figure out where things went > awry here... > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
