On 5/9/12 6:17 PM, Eran Hammer wrote: > All Russ was asking for is an explanation. Instead, he was told there > was no good reason and that it should be changed. That was clearly not > an honest representation of clear working group consensus from over 10 > months ago which was achieved at great effort.
Was it presented this way in the proto write-up or verbally on an IESG telechat or in some other way? Just curious to figure out where things went awry here... Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/ _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
