I would characterize it as two distinct camps, folks that think WF can be
updated to do what SWD (growing contingent I think) does and folks that are
invested in SWD. I haven't seen any movement between those two camps,
specifically that the SWD folks think WF can in fact solve their problem if
updated.
-bill
>________________________________
> From: Murray S. Kucherawy <m...@cloudmark.com>
>To: "oauth@ietf.org WG" <oauth@ietf.org>; Apps Discuss <apps-disc...@ietf.org>
>Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:32 AM
>Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] [apps-discuss] Web Finger vs. Simple Web Discovery
>(SWD)
>
>By all means people should correct me if they think I'm wrong about this, but
>so far from monitoring the discussion there seems to be general support for
>focusing on WebFinger and developing it to meet the needs of those who have
>deployed SWD, versus the opposite.
>
>Does anyone want to argue the opposite?
>
>-MSK, appsawg co-chair
>
>_______________________________________________
>OAuth mailing list
>OAuth@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
