On 10/06/11 23:17, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> Extensibility in authentication schemes is a bad thing, given how they are 
> deployed and the difficulty of changing them. No existing authentication 
> scheme is extensible (explicitly).

Maybe that statement is a tad too general? [1]

S.

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3748


> 
> EHL
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Marius Scurtescu
>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 10:39 AM
>> To: John Kemp
>> Cc: paul Tarjan; OAuth WG
>> Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] consistency of token param name in bearer token
>> type
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 9:34 AM, John Kemp <j...@jkemp.net> wrote:
>>> George,
>>>
>>> On Jun 10, 2011, at 4:11 PM, George Fletcher wrote:
>>>
>>>> I definitely don't want to change the Authorization header naming
>> scheme. I believe it should stay 'Bearer' because that's what the token is. 
>> We
>> could make it...
>>>>
>>>> Authorization: Bearer access_token=vF9dft4qmT
>>>>
>>>> If that helps with consistency.
>>>
>>> Well, it might seem more consistent, but I'm not sure it's worthwhile to
>> make the change just for that reason.
>>>
>>> Is it possible that the Bearer HTTP mechanism would ever take multiple
>> parameters? In which case, having the ability to name the parameters of the
>> Bearer mechanism might become more interesting.
>>
>> Hard to say, but using a proper name/value pair has several advantages:
>> - permits extensibility
>> - no need to limit or define character set of access tokens (name is either
>> "token" or "quoted string")
>> - HTTP header parsers can properly deal with name/value pairs
>>
>> If we make changes to the GET/POST parameter name then I think we
>> should also consider the header as well.
>>
>> Marius
>> _______________________________________________
>> OAuth mailing list
>> OAuth@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
> 
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to