Don't care. Will never use it. :-) EHL
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Recordon [mailto:record...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 1:20 AM > To: George Fletcher; Eran Hammer-Lahav; Doug Tangren > Cc: Mike Jones; paul Tarjan; oauth@ietf.org; Marius Scurtescu > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] consistency of token param name in bearer token > type > > George, Doug and Eran are you alright with the Bearer token spec using the > parameter name "access_token" as well? > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Marius Scurtescu > <mscurte...@google.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Mike Jones > <michael.jo...@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> If you can drive a consensus decision for the name "access_token", I'd be > glad to change the name in the spec. I agree that the current names are > confusing for developers. > > > > At Google we are getting the same feedback, that it is confusing for > > developers. It would definitely help if we could change the name to > > "access_token". > > > > Marius > > _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
