I guess you can sort it out at the meeting. I thought the plan was to distill the security document into a shorter (but not insignificant) security consideration section (I was expecting something in the range of 10-20 pages), and also publish the model document with added details.
EHL > -----Original Message----- > From: Hannes Tschofenig [mailto:hannes.tschofe...@gmx.net] > Sent: Sunday, March 27, 2011 1:10 AM > To: Eran Hammer-Lahav > Cc: Hannes Tschofenig; OAuth WG > Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Authors, Contributors, Acknowledgement > > That's what I thought was the plan. > (Assuming the working group agrees to work on a separate document. I > would support it.) > > On Mar 27, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > > > So the new plan is for you to provide the text for the security section and > just publish their work as a separate RFC as the same time? _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
