In an ideal world, everything that lives alongside the official oauth parameters is known to oauth, but we don't live in an ideal world and the spec needs to be able to cope with that.
I can live with the relaxation here as well -- it's a reasonable compromise, though not the ideal. I'm also assuming that the relaxation would apply to the registry requirement as well? -- Justin ________________________________________ From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marius Scurtescu [mscurte...@google.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:44 PM To: Eran Hammer-Lahav Cc: oauth@ietf.org Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-oauth-v2-12.txt On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <e...@hueniverse.com> wrote: > How about turn the MUST to a SHOULD for using the x_ prefix? OK, let's go with that. Thanks, Marius _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
