On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <e...@hueniverse.com> wrote: > This is not aimed at anyone in particular. > > Replying +1 is not justification for a major breaking change. This was raised > in the past and consensus was that this is not a major concern. Over the past > 10 months not a single actual issue was raised about conflicts in legacy > platforms. If you have an *actual* issue with a platform, please provide the > full details, including why known mechanisms such as Apache rewrite rules > can't solve the it.
I just raised an actual issue. Because OAuth 2 parameters are not prefixed, starting with v11 the spec requires all other parameters to use the "x_" prefix. Google cannot comply with that. Dropping the x_ requirement is good enough IMO. If you are worried about that, then you are probably afraid of an actual issue as well. Marius _______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
