Hey Justin, what's a good example of where the instance name parameter would be used? Desktop apps like TweetDeck just ask me to authorize "TweetDesk" and don't separate between my laptop and desktop. Another example would be our Facebook mobile apps but "Facebook for iPhone" has a different client id than "Facebook for Android".
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Justin Richer <jric...@mitre.org> wrote: > Does the group have an opinion on adding the instance information that I > proposed before* to this UX extension vs. having it live in its own > extension? > > -- Justin > > * http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg03717.html > > On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:23 -0400, David Recordon wrote: > > Given our implementation experience, an iPad should use "popup" as > > it's a full web browser on a reasonably large screen. Android and the > > iPhone should use "touch". I'd be happy to add clarifying language in > > the extension but am weary about adding the complexity of the client > > requesting dimensions. > > > > > > As a side note, this draft is now up > > at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux-00. > > > > > > --David > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Marius Scurtescu > > <mscurte...@google.com> wrote: > > David, > > > > Here is some feedback I received internally from Greg Robbins: > > > > "Having "display" as an extension is useful, though > > considering the > > trend towards tablet devices like the iPad, "touch" and > > "popup" seem > > orthogonal rather than mutually exclusive. > > > > It would also be nice if the client could indicate the > > dimensions > > available for display so the server can make a smarter > > presentation. > > Desktop, netbook, tablet, and mobile screen dimensions vary > > widely > > now." > > > > Marius > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:51 PM, David Recordon > > <record...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I wrote this draft last month based on discussions on the > > mailing list, the > > > OpenID user experience extension (which Facebook, Google, > > and Yahoo! have > > > deployed), and some OAuth 2.0 implementation experience from > > Facebook. It > > > defines language and display preferences which the client > > can include in > > > requests to the end-user authorization endpoint. > > > A previous draft included an immediate mode parameter but > > further discussion > > > has shown that it should be removed until identity > > information is also > > > addressed. Identity is outside the scope of this particular > > extension. > > > I'd like this draft to become a working group document and > > have done my best > > > to make it represent the group's consensus. Unfortunately > > the internet draft > > > submission process is closed for a few weeks until after the > > meeting. :-\ > > > Thanks, > > > --David > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > OAuth mailing list > > > OAuth@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
