+1 on making this a WG item (as well as the device draft). EHL
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David Recordon Sent: Friday, August 27, 2010 1:27 PM To: OAuth WG Cc: Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] Moving the User Experience Extension draft forward And to follow that up, I'd like to request that this draft moves to become a Working Group item. I'm am happy to continue acting as the editor. On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:23 PM, David Recordon <record...@gmail.com<mailto:record...@gmail.com>> wrote: Given our implementation experience, an iPad should use "popup" as it's a full web browser on a reasonably large screen. Android and the iPhone should use "touch". I'd be happy to add clarifying language in the extension but am weary about adding the complexity of the client requesting dimensions. As a side note, this draft is now up at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-recordon-oauth-v2-ux-00. --David On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Marius Scurtescu <mscurte...@google.com<mailto:mscurte...@google.com>> wrote: David, Here is some feedback I received internally from Greg Robbins: "Having "display" as an extension is useful, though considering the trend towards tablet devices like the iPad, "touch" and "popup" seem orthogonal rather than mutually exclusive. It would also be nice if the client could indicate the dimensions available for display so the server can make a smarter presentation. Desktop, netbook, tablet, and mobile screen dimensions vary widely now." Marius On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 12:51 PM, David Recordon <record...@gmail.com<mailto:record...@gmail.com>> wrote: > I wrote this draft last month based on discussions on the mailing list, the > OpenID user experience extension (which Facebook, Google, and Yahoo! have > deployed), and some OAuth 2.0 implementation experience from Facebook. It > defines language and display preferences which the client can include in > requests to the end-user authorization endpoint. > A previous draft included an immediate mode parameter but further discussion > has shown that it should be removed until identity information is also > addressed. Identity is outside the scope of this particular extension. > I'd like this draft to become a working group document and have done my best > to make it represent the group's consensus. Unfortunately the internet draft > submission process is closed for a few weeks until after the meeting. :-\ > Thanks, > --David > _______________________________________________ > OAuth mailing list > OAuth@ietf.org<mailto:OAuth@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth > >
_______________________________________________ OAuth mailing list OAuth@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
