No, the people who don't like the sharing of the namespace between the 2
still don't like it, and the people that can;t stand teh idea of using
oauth2 for anything still won't move.
________________________________
From: oauth-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:oauth-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of David Recordon
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:38 AM
To: Brian Eaton
Cc: oauth@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth vs OAuth2 in Authorization header
I thought this topic had been beaten to death before. An OAuth
1.0 protected resource request includes a variety of oauth_ parameters
whereas OAuth 2.0 just has oauth_token.
--David
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Brian Eaton
<bea...@google.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:59 AM, Justin Richer
<jric...@mitre.org> wrote:
> +1 on OAuth2 header, and I also want to see
oauth2_token in URI and form
> parameter methods.
Good point about the query parameter names needing to be
unambiguous.
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
