I don't know if this is helpful or not... but there was a proposed extension for OAuth 1.0 dealing with encoding OAuth responses in different body formats... this can be found on the now extinct oauth-extensions google group.

http://groups.google.com/group/oauth-extensions/browse_thread/thread/419ec4e986ff5cd8?hl=en#

Thanks,
George

On 6/4/10 8:56 AM, Andrew Arnott wrote:
In the absence of anyone else volunteering an XML format, what would you say to this as a proposal (because the implementation of which happens to be simple for me):

<root type="object">
<access_token type="string">some access token</access_token>
<refresh_token type="string">some refresh token</refresh_token>
<expires_in type="number">235298298</expires_in>
</root>

So the main points here is:

   1. no namespace
   2. root tag is called "root"
   3. each parameter is an element
   4. each element has a type parameter that is either string, number,
      or object to assist the deserializer to understnad how to cast
      the contents.

We may axe #4. In fact we may want to switch all the elements to attributes because it's slightly more compact which might help small devices.

--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre


On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Andrew Arnott <andrewarn...@gmail.com <mailto:andrewarn...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Where is the definition of how a auth server response in XML
    format should look?  At the least we need an XML namespace and
    root node name.

    --
    Andrew Arnott
    "I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to
    the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre



_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to