I don't know if this is helpful or not... but there was a proposed
extension for OAuth 1.0 dealing with encoding OAuth responses in
different body formats... this can be found on the now extinct
oauth-extensions google group.
http://groups.google.com/group/oauth-extensions/browse_thread/thread/419ec4e986ff5cd8?hl=en#
Thanks,
George
On 6/4/10 8:56 AM, Andrew Arnott wrote:
In the absence of anyone else volunteering an XML format, what would
you say to this as a proposal (because the implementation of which
happens to be simple for me):
<root type="object">
<access_token type="string">some access token</access_token>
<refresh_token type="string">some refresh token</refresh_token>
<expires_in type="number">235298298</expires_in>
</root>
So the main points here is:
1. no namespace
2. root tag is called "root"
3. each parameter is an element
4. each element has a type parameter that is either string, number,
or object to assist the deserializer to understnad how to cast
the contents.
We may axe #4. In fact we may want to switch all the elements to
attributes because it's slightly more compact which might help small
devices.
--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the
death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Andrew Arnott <andrewarn...@gmail.com
<mailto:andrewarn...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Where is the definition of how a auth server response in XML
format should look? At the least we need an XML namespace and
root node name.
--
Andrew Arnott
"I [may] not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to
the death your right to say it." - S. G. Tallentyre
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth