On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 8:26 AM, Chuck Mortimore
<cmortim...@salesforce.com> wrote:
> Our plan is to treat SAML assertions passed over the assertion flow as
> bearer assertions, so I believe we have everything we need contained within
> the assertion (issuer + audience + signature).  That being said, if we want
> this to be an extensible flow, not all assertion formats will be so
> transparent.
>
> I think this is a reasonable suggestion, as long as the clientid/secret are
> entirely optional.    Not in support of a second User Assertion Flow.

Yes.  This sounds right to me.

Cheers,
Brian
_______________________________________________
OAuth mailing list
OAuth@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth

Reply via email to