Amoratinos commented on code in PR #1882:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1882#discussion_r1862479032


##########
oak-core/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/oak/security/user/UserImpl.java:
##########
@@ -42,12 +42,16 @@
 class UserImpl extends AuthorizableImpl implements User {
 
     private final boolean isAdmin;
+    private final boolean isAnonymous;
     private final PasswordHistory pwHistory;
+    private final boolean allowDisableAnonymous;
 
     UserImpl(String id, Tree tree, UserManagerImpl userManager) throws 
RepositoryException {
         super(id, tree, userManager);
 
         isAdmin = UserUtil.isAdmin(userManager.getConfig(), id);
+        isAnonymous = 
UserUtil.getAnonymousId(userManager.getConfig()).equals(id);
+        allowDisableAnonymous = 
userManager.getConfig().getConfigValue(UserConstants.PARAM_ALLOW_DISABLE_ANONYMOUS,
 true);

Review Comment:
   I also considered it but in that case I'd have to keep a reference to the 
configuration parameters on each UserImpl instance. Not sure if this could have 
a performance impact as well. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: oak-dev-unsubscr...@jackrabbit.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to