reschke commented on PR #1526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jackrabbit-oak/pull/1526#issuecomment-2225379200

   bq. For RDB it could be different: it could mean that if you want to use 
compression for RDB you'd have to accept that broken surrogates are not 
supported (unless we find a fast way to support it in compression).
   
   The elephant in the room is segment persistence, which IMHO allows *any* 
Java string. I don't believe discussing the differences of document store 
backends is helpful here; we should come to an agreement what the expections 
for Oak in *general* are. Having document store and segment store behave 
differently IMHO is a problem we should solve (by fixing segment store, would 
be my preference).


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to