oak-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11656): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-9586): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11866 Support for datastore files without length [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11866 Support for datastore files without length [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11866 Support for datastore files without length [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11866 Support for datastore files without length [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11866 Support for datastore files without length [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11866 Support for datastore files without length [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11656: Remove usage of Guava Suppliers.memoize [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11836 : removed Guava's AbstractIterator with Oak commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11836 : removed Guava's AbstractIterator with Oak commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11836 : removed Guava's AbstractIterator with Oak commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11836 : removed Guava's AbstractIterator with Oak commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-9586): Workflow run "Commit Check" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/jsedding/OAK-11861-segment-parallel-initialization): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/jsedding/OAK-11861-segment-parallel-initialization): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/jsedding/OAK-11861-segment-parallel-initialization): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/jsedding/OAK-11861-segment-parallel-initialization): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/jsedding/OAK-11861-segment-parallel-initialization): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11862): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11862): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11862: missing facets for multi-valued fields [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11862: missing facets for multi-valued fields [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-11846): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-11846): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-11846): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/issue/OAK-11846): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11861 - segment store initialization should run in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11860 - oak-segment-azure should perform I/O in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11860 - oak-segment-azure should perform I/O in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11860 - oak-segment-azure should perform I/O in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11860 - oak-segment-azure should perform I/O in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11860 - oak-segment-azure should perform I/O in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11860 - oak-segment-azure should perform I/O in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11860 - oak-segment-azure should perform I/O in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11860 - oak-segment-azure should perform I/O in parallel [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11846 oak-segment-azure - recovery will recover from .bak [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11846 oak-segment-azure - recovery will recover from .bak [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11846 oak-segment-azure - recovery will recover from .bak [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11846 oak-segment-azure - recovery will recover from .bak [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11846 oak-segment-azure - recovery will recover from .bak [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11846 oak-segment-azure - recovery will recover from .bak [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11846 oak-segment-azure - recovery will recover from .bak [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11846 oak-segment-azure - recovery will recover from .bak [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11846 oak-segment-azure - recovery will recover from .bak [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11846 oak-segment-azure - recovery will recover from .bak [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on - Update #1075561481" failed! GitBox
• [ANNOUNCE] Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.84.0 released Julian Reschke
• [PR] OAK-11859: update Tomcat dependency to 9.0.108 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11859: update Tomcat dependency to 9.0.108 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11859: update Tomcat dependency to 9.0.108 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11859: update Tomcat dependency to 9.0.108 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11859: update Tomcat dependency to 9.0.108 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11859: update Tomcat dependency to 9.0.108 [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on - Update #1075456198" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/dependabot/maven/oak-examples/webapp/org.apache.tomcat-tomcat-coyote-9.0.108): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/dependabot/maven/oak-examples/webapp/org.apache.tomcat-tomcat-coyote-9.0.108): Workflow run "Commit Check" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote - Update #1075126854" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] Bump org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote from 9.0.107 to 9.0.108 in /oak-examples/webapp [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote from 9.0.107 to 9.0.108 in /oak-examples/webapp [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote from 9.0.107 to 9.0.108 in /oak-examples/webapp [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Bump org.apache.tomcat:tomcat-coyote from 9.0.107 to 9.0.108 in /oak-examples/webapp [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/trunk): Workflow run "maven in /oak-parent for org.bouncycastle:bcpkix-jdk15on - Update #1075119407" failed! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11858: Remove remains of Oak bloom filter in oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11858: Remove remains of Oak bloom filter in oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11858: Remove remains of Oak bloom filter in oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11858: Remove remains of Oak bloom filter in oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11858: Remove remains of Oak bloom filter in oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11858: Remove remains of Oak bloom filter in oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11858: Remove remains of Oak bloom filter in oak-run-commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11857 - Improve path handling in oak-segment-azure [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11857 - Improve path handling in oak-segment-azure [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11857 - Improve path handling in oak-segment-azure [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11857 - Improve path handling in oak-segment-azure [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11857 - Improve path handling in oak-segment-azure [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11833): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11833): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11833): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11833 : replaced Guava's Traverser with OAK commons [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-10856): Workflow run "Commit Check" is working again! GitBox
• [PR] OAK-10856: oak-run-commons: remove usage of old Oak bloom filter, use oak-commons instead [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-10856: oak-run-commons: remove usage of old Oak bloom filter, use oak-commons instead [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11856: oak-run-commons: remove usage of old Oak bloom filter, use oak-commons instead [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11856: oak-run-commons: remove usage of old Oak bloom filter, use oak-commons instead [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11856: oak-run-commons: remove usage of old Oak bloom filter, use oak-commons instead [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11856: oak-run-commons: remove usage of old Oak bloom filter, use oak-commons instead [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11856: oak-run-commons: remove usage of old Oak bloom filter, use oak-commons instead [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11856: oak-run-commons: remove usage of old Oak bloom filter, use oak-commons instead [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11856: oak-run-commons: remove usage of old Oak bloom filter, use oak-commons instead [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11855: update oak-blob to use oak-commons bloom filter [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11855: update oak-blob to use oak-commons bloom filter [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11855: update oak-blob to use oak-commons bloom filter [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11855: update oak-blob to use oak-commons bloom filter [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [PR] OAK-11852: add missing test class [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11852: add missing test class [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11852: add missing test class [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] OAK-11852: add missing test class [jackrabbit-oak] via GitHub
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11832): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11832): Workflow run "Build" is working again! GitBox
• [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11851): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox
  • [GH] (jackrabbit-oak/OAK-11851): Workflow run "Build" failed! GitBox

• Earlier messages
• Later messages