But ... But ... But em-spec seems to be calling fibers like threads! Augh! Full circle!
On 13 June 2010 18:41, doug livesey <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, genetic algorithms -- it was wanting to play with these that got me > really into coding years ago, but then the more I coded professionally, the > less time I spent on them. The problem with working obsessively is that > there's too little time for fun! > They're always in the back of my head, though, especially when I look at > new languages or techniques. > > > On 13 June 2010 18:35, Ciaran <[email protected]> wrote: > >> a >> On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:29 PM, doug livesey <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Well, after an afternoon's reading, I'm suspecting that I *have* rather >> > missed the point, but am still waiting for all the pieces to settle in >> my >> > poor head. >> > I was hoping they'd be something like Erlang's spawned processes, but >> > they're not. >> > They're still very cool continuations, though, and I think I've seen a >> > really cool way I can implement a fair way to slice processor time up >> for >> > GAs & measure their efficiency with them. If I ever get to writing that >> > particular project ... ;) >> By GA's are we talking genetic algs or some other acronym here ? >> -cj >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "NWRUG" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected]<nwrug-members%[email protected]> >> . >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NWRUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en.
