Yeah, genetic algorithms -- it was wanting to play with these that got me really into coding years ago, but then the more I coded professionally, the less time I spent on them. The problem with working obsessively is that there's too little time for fun! They're always in the back of my head, though, especially when I look at new languages or techniques.
On 13 June 2010 18:35, Ciaran <[email protected]> wrote: > a > On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 6:29 PM, doug livesey <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well, after an afternoon's reading, I'm suspecting that I *have* rather > > missed the point, but am still waiting for all the pieces to settle in my > > poor head. > > I was hoping they'd be something like Erlang's spawned processes, but > > they're not. > > They're still very cool continuations, though, and I think I've seen a > > really cool way I can implement a fair way to slice processor time up for > > GAs & measure their efficiency with them. If I ever get to writing that > > particular project ... ;) > By GA's are we talking genetic algs or some other acronym here ? > -cj > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NWRUG" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<nwrug-members%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NWRUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en.
