On Jan 05, 2010, at 7:49 pm, Francis Fish wrote: > Thanks for this Ashley, I think I need to do some deeper and wider scenarios > that blank out mandatory fields like you suggest. Needs some thought. > > I've come up with this, thus far but I think I will work on it using your > suggestions. Even now, just looking at it before pasting it in I can see > things wrong with it, as in too many steps. I'm being lazy and using > Background. There is no background rspec for any of this because I want to > write the specification first for discussion with my business partner so > changing it is easy. Measure twice, cut once. > > Feature: creator manages doodads
Hi Francis How did you get on with this? Ashley -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NWRUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en.
