I must admit I started having a go at this last week and then became totally distracted and never came back to it :( I'll try harder next time.
That said, I'm enjoying looking at the other solutions - and nice work Fred ;) Matt. On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Debbie Carne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Brilliant! :) > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:11 PM, Fred Phillips > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri Oct 31 12:48:52 2008, Paul Robinson wrote: > >> > >> So the deadline has passed. Has anybody got any code they wish to share? > > > > Here's my mathsy solution, takes 0.224 seconds to calculate the > > 100,000th number in the sequence. It doesn't need to calculate the > > previous numbers in the sequence to get the next or to test if a > > number is in it. > > > > > > -- > > Fred O. Phillips > > http://fophillips.org > > BBC7 7572 755F 83E0 3209 504A E4F7 874F 1545 9D41 > > > > > > -- Matt Roberts --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NWRUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nwrug-members?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
