Awesome, and thanks -- that will help calm my OCD :-) W
On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 8:50 PM, Greg Mirsky <gregimir...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Warren, > thank you for the review and suggestion. I've fixed in the new working > version of the draft the uppercased GENEVE in two places - full title and > in Security Considerations. > > Regards, > Greg > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 5:27 PM Warren Kumari via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > >> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-14: No Objection >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to >> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ >> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Thank you for this document, and also thanks to Tony Li for the OpsDir >> review >> ( >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-13-opsdir-telechat-li-2025-01-02/ >> ) >> and your followup. >> >> As a nit, the document title is "Active OAM for use in GENEVE", but the >> document (and RFC 8926) uses Pascal case (Geneve). >> >> >> >>
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list -- nvo3@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to nvo3-le...@ietf.org
