Hi Warren, thank you for the review and suggestion. I've fixed in the new working version of the draft the uppercased GENEVE in two places - full title and in Security Considerations.
Regards, Greg On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 5:27 PM Warren Kumari via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-14: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thank you for this document, and also thanks to Tony Li for the OpsDir > review > ( > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-13-opsdir-telechat-li-2025-01-02/ > ) > and your followup. > > As a nit, the document title is "Active OAM for use in GENEVE", but the > document (and RFC 8926) uses Pascal case (Geneve). > > > >
_______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list -- nvo3@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to nvo3-le...@ietf.org
