On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <[email protected]> wrote: > WG > > There was a discussion in the NVO3 WG meeting in Berlin following strong > advice from our Area Director that we need to come to a consensus on > converging on a common encapsulation. Two sets of questions were asked: > (1) Should the WG move forward with one standards track encap? > (2) For a given encap, do you have significant technical objections? > > This email relates to the second of these questions. Please refer to the > separate email titled “Consensus call on moving forward with single encap” > for discussion related to point (1). > > We would recommend that those not familiar with RFC 7282 "On Consensus and > Humming in the IETF" may wish to read it for a fuller understanding of how > the IETF handles challenging consensus decisions and why. > > We would like to determine the consensus on the following points on the list > (there is a separate thread concerning point (2)): > > 1) Does anyone have a significant technical objection to selecting Geneve as > the single NVO3 Standards track document? Please be as concrete and detailed > as possible as to your technical objection. > > 2) Does anyone have a significant technical objection to selecting VXLAN-GPE > as the single NVO3 Standards track document? Please be as concrete and > detailed as possible as to your technical objection. > > 3)Does anyone have a significant technical objection to selecting GUE as the > single NVO3 Standards track document? Please be as concrete and detailed as > possible as to your technical objection. > > > Please reply to this email thread on the NVO3 list by 29th July 2016. > > Please DO NOT use this thread to argue or debate the importance or details of > any technical objections that arise. That can be done in other threads. This > thread should be used to state your initial objection. Any objections raised > will be summarized in an additional email at the end of this consensus call > so that the WG can discuss the results in detail. > Hi Matthew and Sam,
Is the email summarizing objections going to be sent out soon? Thanks, Tom > While the list of technical issues has been collected for each encapsulation, > the chairs are discussing how to develop an acceptable solution. The goal > is to have an answer before IETF 97. The chairs will follow up to the list > shortly. > > Regards > > Matthew and Sam > > > > _______________________________________________ > nvo3 mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3 _______________________________________________ nvo3 mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nvo3
